Crossmark

Referral of patients to diabetes prevention programmes from community campaigns and general practices: mixed-method evaluation using the RE-AIM framework and Normalisation Process Theory

Crossref DOI link: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-019-4139-5

Published Online: 2019-05-22

Published Print: 2019-12

Update policy: https://doi.org/10.1007/springer_crossmark_policy

Authors

Knowles, Sarah http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0863-5866
Cotterill, Sarah

Coupe, Nia

Spence, Michael
Funding

Funding for this research was provided by:

National Institute for Health Research (NIHR Greater Manchester Collaboration for Leadership in Applied Health Research and Care)
License Information

Text and Data Mining valid from 2019-05-22

Version of Record valid from 2019-05-22
More Information

Article History

Received: 16 May 2018

Accepted: 1 May 2019

First Online: 22 May 2019

Ethics approval and consent to participate

: The study was reviewed by the University of Manchester research office, who review all applications to determine whether formal committee review is required, and it was agreed that there are no material ethical issues, the study is low risk, and that there is no requirement for the study protocol to be submitted to the University Research Ethics Committee (UREC) (AMBS/16/02).

: Written informed consent was provided by all participants prior to taking part in interviews, including consent for the data, including anonymised quotations, to be used in publications arising from the research.

: The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Document is current

Any future updates will be listed below