Crossmark

Exploring the consequences of decentralization: has privatization of health services been the perceived effect of decentralization in Khartoum locality, Sudan?

Crossref DOI link: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-020-05511-z

Published Online: 2020-07-20

Published Print: 2020-12

Update policy: https://doi.org/10.1007/springer_crossmark_policy

Authors

Noory, Bandar https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5377-5729
Hassanain, Sara A.

Lindskog, Benedikte Victoria

Elsony, Asma

Bjune, Gunnar Aksel
License Information

Text and Data Mining valid from 2020-07-20

Version of Record valid from 2020-07-20
More Information

Article History

Received: 4 February 2020

Accepted: 5 July 2020

First Online: 20 July 2020

Ethics approval and consent to participate

: Ethical clearance was attained from the National Research Ethics Review Committee (FMOH) in 2015 and from REK (Regional Committee for Medical-Health Research Ethics) reference (2015/937/−REK), as well as, from Norwegian Social Science Data Services (NSD-44106/3/LB). Participant information sheets were presented verbally and in a written manner. It explained the study scope, objectives, major themes of the questions, anticipated duration of the interview, benefits of the study, and ethical aspects. Voluntary participation and possibility of declining to answer, as well as, the right to withdraw were highlighted to the participants. Signed informed consents were obtained before the interviewing.Names and any traceable information were not physically recorded in the interviews. Moreover, only the researcher had access to the study data which was stored in a specific computer with password protection and no internet access.

: Not Applicable.

: Also, authors have reflected that no competing interests exist.

Document is current

Any future updates will be listed below