Crossmark

A qualitative study to identify critical attributes and attribute-levels for a discrete choice experiment on oral pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) delivery among young people in Cape Town and Johannesburg, South Africa

Crossref DOI link: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-020-05942-8

Published Online: 2021-01-06

Published Print: 2021-12

Update policy: https://doi.org/10.1007/springer_crossmark_policy

Authors

Dietrich, Janan J. http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1949-3138
Atujuna, Millicent

Tshabalala, Gugulethu

Hornschuh, Stefanie

Mulaudzi, Mamakiri

Koh, Michelle

Ahmed, Nadia

Muhumuza, Richard

Ssemata, Andrew S.

Otwombe, Kennedy

Bekker, Linda-Gail

Seeley, Janet

Martinson, Neil A.

Terris-Prestholt, Fern

Fox, Julie
Funding

Funding for this research was provided by:

South African Medical Research Council

European and Developing Countries Clinical Trials Partnership (RIA2016MC-1616 CHAPS)

International AIDS Society (CIPHER: Growing the leaders fellowship)
License Information

Text and Data Mining valid from 2021-01-06

Version of Record valid from 2021-01-06
More Information

Article History

Received: 6 July 2020

Accepted: 19 November 2020

First Online: 6 January 2021

Ethics approval and consent to participate

: This study was approved by the Human Research Ethics Committees of the University of the Witwatersrand and University of Cape Town. Written study informed consent or assent was obtained from all participants. In Soweto, parents/legal guardians provided written informed consent for participants younger than 18 years. Participants and parent/legal guardian signed separate forms for audio-recording. For the Cape Town site, their institutional review board approved a parental waiver and did not require parental consent for participants 13–17 years. Therefore, for Cape Town, participants provided written consent regardless of age.

: Not applicable.

: The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Document is current

Any future updates will be listed below