Document is current
Any future updates will be listed below
-
Authors
Maben, J. http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6168-0455
Taylor, C. http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6239-4744
Reynolds, E.
McCarthy, I. http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4715-9831
Leamy, M.
-
Funding
Funding for this research was provided by:
Health Services and Delivery Research Programme (HS&DR - 13/07/49)
- License Information
-
More Information
Article History
Received: 9 September 2020
Accepted: 6 May 2021
First Online: 18 July 2021
Declarations
:
: Two different ethical approvals were sought and granted:Ethics approval for the Interviews with 48 facilitators/clinical leads in 45 sites running Rounds in 2015 was granted by the ethics committee at King’s College, London reference PNM/13/14–159). Research and development (R&D) approval and letters of access [CSP (Coordinated System for gaining NHS Permissions) number 148528] were also required for all sites before invitations to participate could be sent. These were issued by individual trusts/hospices.Ethics approval for the case study interviews was granted by the National Research Ethics Service Committee London-South East (REC reference 15/LO/0053).Written informed consent was obtained from all participants.
: Not applicable.
: Professor Jill Maben reports that she was a member of an advisory group from 2006 to 2009, advising on the development of the Point of Care project at The King’s Fund, and a member of the Point of Care Foundation (PoCF) Board 2013–14; she stepped down as board member at the start of the evaluation.
