Updates are available Correction dated 2021-12-09
Click to view Correction: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-021-07295-2
-
Authors
Dalton-Locke, Christian
Johnson, Sonia
Harju-Seppänen, Jasmine
Lyons, Natasha
Sheridan Rains, Luke
Stuart, Ruth
Campbell, Amelia
Clark, Jeremy
Clifford, Aisling
Courtney, Laura
Dare, Ceri
Kelly, Kathleen
Lynch, Chris
McCrone, Paul
Nairi, Shilpa
Newbigging, Karen
Nyikavaranda, Patrick
Osborn, David
Persaud, Karen
Stefan, Martin
Lloyd-Evans, Brynmor
- License Information
-
More Information
Article History
Received: 6 July 2021
Accepted: 15 October 2021
First Online: 29 October 2021
Change Date: 9 December 2021
Change Type: Correction
Change Details: A Correction to this paper has been published:
Change Details: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-021-07295-2
Declarations
:
: The study was reviewed and approved as a service evaluation by Noclor, the research support service overseeing research governance for several NHS Trusts in North London. As a service evaluation rather than research in which no personal data were collected, the survey did not require review and approval from a research ethics committee nor did it require participants to provide informed consent. We did however provide staff invited to take part in this survey with a participant information sheet (see InternalRef removed). Wherever participants directed us to local R&D or audit committees, we followed Trusts’ local governance procedures.
: Not applicable. Our plans to publish findings from this study was explained to participants in the Introduction to the survey. This text can be viewed in the copy of the survey included in the InternalRef removed.
: The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
