Stefánsdóttir, Nina Thórný
Nilsen, Per
Lindstroem, Mette Bendtz
Andersen, Ove
Powell, Byron J.
Tjørnhøj-Thomsen, Tine
Kirk, Jeanette Wassar
Article History
Received: 15 December 2021
Accepted: 14 March 2022
First Online: 5 April 2022
Change Date: 28 April 2022
Change Type: Update
Change Details: The presentation of Table 1 was updated in the PDF version this publication.
Declarations
:
: The study was approved by the Danish Data Protection Agency (ID no.: VD-2019-160). The study is not required to be reported to the Research Ethics Committee of the Capital Region of Denmark, cf. section 1, subsection 4 of the Committee Act, and could therefore be carried out without permission from the Research Ethics Committees of the Capital Region of Denmark. In accordance with Danish law, formal ethical approval is not mandatory for studies not involving biomedical issues and was, therefore, not obtained.Oral and written informed consent was obtained from all participants as the study adhered to the ethical principles of the Helsinki Declaration [CitationRef removed]. Taking inspiration from situational ethics, we accompanied our knowledge of the organizational context with responsibility, morality, and intuition during the interviews [CitationRef removed]. For example, we made the conditions of anonymity clear and underlined our independence from the hospital management. We were constantly aware of the fact that we were dealing with what is to some an emotional and frustrating subject, as change within an organization is usually associated with psychological uncertainty [CitationRef removed].
: Not applicable.
: The authors declare that they have no competing interests.