Berthelsen, Hanne https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4573-4548
Corin, Linda https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6056-2190
Leineweber, Constanze https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8433-2405
Stjernlöf, Sara https://orcid.org/0009-0006-7600-654X
Muhonen, Tuija https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5972-4933
Westerlund, Hugo https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8806-5698
Funding for this research was provided by:
Malmö University
Article History
Received: 13 February 2026
Accepted: 8 July 2026
First Online: 15 July 2026
Declarations
Ethics approval and consent to participate: All procedures were performed in accordance with the ethical standards of the national research committee and the 1964 Declaration of Helsinki and its subsequent amendments, or with comparable ethical standards. Study A utilised data from SLOSH, which is part of the REWHARD consortium supported by the Swedish Research Council (VR #2021 − 00154). Data collection in SLOSH was approved by the Regional Ethical Review Board in Stockholm under no. 2012/373 − 31/5, and with the latest update by the Swedish Ethical Review Authority approved (no. 2025-01135-02). Participants received written information on the survey, and returning the survey indicated informed consent. The analyses in the present study were approved by the Swedish Ethical Review Authority (no. 2024-01619-01). Study B utilised data from a regional exit survey. Participants received written information on the survey, and returning the survey indicated informed consent. The analyses in the present study were approved by the Swedish Ethical Review Authority (no. 2024-01480-01).
Consent for publication: Not applicable.
Use of AI: During the preparation of this work, the authors used Grammarly for language editing. After using this tool, the authors reviewed and edited the content as needed and take full responsibility for the publication’s content.
Competing interests: The authors declare no competing interests.