Crossmark

Clinical and economic outcomes of remotely delivered cognitive behaviour therapy versus treatment as usual for repeat unscheduled care users with severe health anxiety: a multicentre randomised controlled trial

Crossref DOI link: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12916-019-1253-5

Published Online: 2019-01-23

Published Print: 2019-12

Update policy: https://doi.org/10.1007/springer_crossmark_policy

Authors

Morriss, Richard http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2910-4121
Patel, Shireen

Malins, Sam

Guo, Boliang

Higton, Fred

James, Marilyn

Wu, Mengjun

Brown, Paula

Boycott, Naomi

Kaylor-Hughes, Catherine

Morris, Martin

Rowley, Emma

Simpson, Jayne

Smart, David

Stubley, Michelle

Kai, Joe

Tyrer, Helen
Funding

Funding for this research was provided by:

National Institute for Health Research (NIHR CLAHRC East Midlands)
License Information

Text and Data Mining valid from 2019-01-23
More Information

Article History

Received: 2 October 2018

Accepted: 7 January 2019

First Online: 23 January 2019

Ethics approval and consent to participate

: Ethical approval was obtained from the National Research Ethics Service London – Riverside Committee (reference 14/LO/1102). All participants gave written informed and oral consent to the study, directly to a member of the research team.

: Not applicable.

: The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Document is current

Any future updates will be listed below