Watson, Conall H.
Gsell, Pierre-Stéphane
Hall, Yper
Camacho, Anton
Riveros, Ximena
Enwere, Godwin
Vicari, Andrea
Nadlaou, Séverine Danmadji
Toure, Alhassane
Sani, Ismaila M.
Diallo, Abdourahamane
Kolie, Cece
Duraffour, Sophie
Ifono, Kékoura
Maomou, Andre
Dore, Kassie
Djidonou, Honora A.
Bagayoko, Aminata
Damey, Philos P.
Camara, Mabetty Nancy
Diallo, Fatoumata Battouly
Oumar, Fofana Thierno
Toure, Kalidou
Diaby, Mohamed Lamine
Sylla, Lansana
Conde, Doussou
Kaba, Ibrahima Lansana
Tipton, Tom
Eggo, Rosalind M.
Marks, Michael
Roberts, Chrissy H.
Strecker, Thomas
Günther, Stephan
Keita, Sakoba
Edmunds, W. John
Carroll, Miles W.
Henao-Restrepo, Ana Maria
Funding for this research was provided by:
National Institute for Health and Care Research
World Health Organization
United Nations Foundation
Directorate-General for Development and Cooperation - EuropeAid
Article History
Received: 11 June 2024
Accepted: 24 October 2024
First Online: 7 November 2024
Declarations
:
: The study was approved by the World Health Organization (WHO) Research Ethics Review Committee (ERC.0002723), the London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, UK, interventional research ethics committee (10523/RR/4674), and by the Comité National d’Ethique pour la Recherche en Santé of Guinea. Communities were approached and the study explained by the study’s community engagement team, and permission obtained to enter the community. Individual written informed consent was obtained for all participants using a signed, printed information sheet. For child participants, consent was obtained from parents or guardians. Children aged 12 to 17 years also gave written consent. If the potential participant was illiterate, the documents were read in a local language and a fingerprint collected, countersigned by a literate independent witness. The teams taking informed consent were different from those involved in community engagement and the epidemiological determination of <i>proches</i> to include in the rings.
: The authors declare no competing interests.