Crossmark

Pelvic modelling and the comparison between plate position for double pelvic osteotomy using artificial cancellous bone and finite element analysis

Crossref DOI link: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12917-018-1416-1

Published Online: 2018-03-20

Published Print: 2018-12

Update policy: https://doi.org/10.1007/springer_crossmark_policy

Authors

McCartney, William

MacDonald, Bryan

Ober, Ciprian Andrei

Lostado-Lorza, Rubén

Gómez, Fátima Somovilla
License Information

Text and Data Mining valid from 2018-03-20
More Information

Article History

Received: 27 November 2017

Accepted: 8 March 2018

First Online: 20 March 2018

Ethics approval

: This research was a cadaveric study and it was conducted in accordance with institutional animal ethics policies. No institutional ethics approval was necessary.

: Not applicable.

: The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.