Crossmark

Predicting career sector intent and the theory of planned behaviour: survey findings from Australian veterinary science students

Crossref DOI link: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12917-018-1725-4

Published Online: 2019-01-15

Published Print: 2019-12

Update policy: https://doi.org/10.1007/springer_crossmark_policy

Authors

Feakes, A. M. https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4393-8352
Palmer, E. J.

Petrovski, K. R.

Thomsen, D. A.

Hyams, J. H.

Cake, M. A.

Webster, B.

Barber, S. R.
Funding

Funding for this research was provided by:

Provet
License Information

Text and Data Mining valid from 2019-01-15
More Information

Article History

Received: 23 January 2018

Accepted: 30 November 2018

First Online: 15 January 2019

Ethics approval and consent to participate

: The study was approved by the human research ethics committees of each of the participating universities as follows (H-035-2011 University of Adelaide, HREC 416/2012/05 Charles Sturt University, HREC 1237395.1 University of Melbourne, HREC 2012/014 Murdoch University, HREC H5538 James Cook University). University of Adelaide participants in 2014 used an on-line survey. Written informed consent was obtained from study participants using paper versions of the survey, and the on-line version participation information preamble included the following (approved by the master HREC H-035-2011) stated clearly …“… Participation in this study is voluntary. By filling out the survey, you will be choosing to be involved in the study … ”

: Not applicable.

: One of the authors of this manuscript (MAC) is a section editor for BMC Veterinary Research. The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.