Crossmark

The in vitro behaviour of canine osteoblasts derived from different bone types

Crossref DOI link: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12917-019-1857-1

Published Online: 2019-04-11

Published Print: 2019-12

Update policy: https://doi.org/10.1007/springer_crossmark_policy

Authors

Meeson, Richard L. http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8972-7067
Perpétuo, Inês P.

Parsons, Kevin

Orriss, Isabel R.

Shah, Mittal

Pitsillides, Andrew A.

Doube, Michael
Funding

Funding for this research was provided by:

Petplan Charitable Trust (S14-40)

Leverhulme Trust (RPG-2014-350)
License Information

Text and Data Mining valid from 2019-04-11
More Information

Article History

Received: 19 October 2018

Accepted: 28 March 2019

First Online: 11 April 2019

Ethics approval and consent to participate

: Informed written consent was obtained from their owners by means of a residual tissue clause in the client consent form. The Royal Veterinary College’s Clinical Research and Ethical Review Board approved the use of residual clinical samples, taken for diagnostic purposes, for research with informed owner consent (URN 20181829–2).

: Not applicable.

: Dr. Richard Meeson is a member of the BMC Veterinary Research Editorial Board as an Associate Editor, otherwise the authors declare that they have no competing interests.

: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.