Updates are available Correction dated 2019-08-08
Click to view Correction: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12917-019-2034-2
-
Authors
Heimes, A.
Brodhagen, J.
Weikard, R.
Hammon, H. M.
Meyerholz, M. M.
Petzl, W.
Zerbe, H.
Engelmann, S.
Schmicke, M.
Hoedemaker, M.
Schuberth, H.-J.
Kühn, C. http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0216-424X
-
Funding
Funding for this research was provided by:
Bundesanstalt für Landwirtschaft und Ernährung (740 718)
- License Information
-
More Information
Article History
Received: 11 December 2018
Accepted: 30 June 2019
First Online: 11 July 2019
Change Date: 8 August 2019
Change Type: Correction
Change Details: The original article [1] contained an error whereby the captions to Figs 2 and 3 were mistakenly inverted; this has now been corrected.
Ethics approval
: For the FBN cohort, the experiment was conducted under the reference number 7221.3–1-055/15 with the approval by the responsible authority (LALLF, Landesamt für Landwirtschaft, Lebensmittelsicherheit und Fischerei Mecklenburg-Vorpommern, Rostock, Germany). For the TiHo cohort, the experiment was performed under the reference number 33.12–42502–04-15/2024 by the Lower Saxony Federal State Office for Consumer Protection and Food Safety. This study was submitted to and approved by the ethics committees of the Leibniz Institute for Farm Animal Biology and the University of Veterinary Medicine Hanover, respectively. All ethical evaluations were performed as required by the German Animal Care law and associated legislative regulations (“Tierschutzgesetz”,ExternalRef removed).
: Not applicable.
: The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
