Seidlova, Veronika
Zukal, Jan
Brichta, Jiri
Anisimov, Nikolay
Apoznański, Grzegorz
Bandouchova, Hana
Bartonička, Tomáš
Berková, Hana
Botvinkin, Alexander D.
Heger, Tomas
Dundarova, Heliana
Kokurewicz, Tomasz
Linhart, Petr
Orlov, Oleg L.
Piacek, Vladimir
Presetnik, Primož
Shumkina, Alexandra P.
Tiunov, Mikhail P.
Treml, Frantisek
Pikula, Jiri
Funding for this research was provided by:
Grantová Agentura České Republiky (17-20286S)
Ministry of Education, Youth and Science (Grant No. KП-06-H31/14)
Article History
Received: 27 November 2019
Accepted: 2 December 2020
First Online: 10 December 2020
Ethics approval and consent to participate
: Team members were authorised to handle wild bats according to the Czech Certificate of Competency (No. CZ01341; § 17, Act No. 246/1992 Coll.). Experimental procedures were approved by the Ethical Committee of the Czech Academy of Sciences (Document No. 169/2011). In the Czech Republic, capturing of bats for sample collection complied with Czech Law No. 114/1992 on Nature and Landscape Protection and was based on permits issued by the Agency for Nature Conservation and Landscape Protection of the Czech Republic (01662/MK/2012S/00775/MK/2012, 866/JS/2012 and 00356/KK/2008/AOPK) and Podyjí National Park (NPP 0312/2018). The II Local Ethical Commission in Wrocław approved sampling at the Natura 2000 site “Nietoperek” in Poland (No. 45/2015). Sampling in Bulgaria, Poland, Russia and Slovenia was approved by the Bulgarian Ministry of Environment and Water (No. 645/13.08.2015 and No. 683/04.07.2016), the Regional Directorate for Environmental Protection in Gorzów Wielkopolski, Poland (No. WPN-I-6205.10.2015.AI), the Institute of Plant and Animal Ecology - Ural Division of the Russian Academy of Sciences (No. 16353 − 2115/325) and the Ministry of Environment and Spatial Planning of the Republic of Slovenia, Slovenian Environment Agency (No. 35601-35/2010-6).
: Not applicable.
: The authors declare that they have no competing interests.