Updates are available Correction dated 2021-04-02
Click to view Correction: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12917-021-02856-3
-
Authors
Isaya, Rosaria
Ciccarelli, Stefano
Enache, Daniela
Specchi, Swan
Pesaresi, Marco
Ferri, Filippo
Porporato, Federico
Auriemma, Edoardo
Contiero, Barbara
Coppola, Luigi M
Zini, Eric
-
Funding
Funding for this research was provided by:
Università degli Studi di Padova (BIRD168451)
- License Information
-
More Information
Article History
Received: 13 March 2020
Accepted: 9 December 2020
First Online: 7 January 2021
Change Date: 1 April 2021
Change Type: Update
Change Details: The original article was revised to correct authors' names which were mistakenly inverted.
Change Date: 2 April 2021
Change Type: Correction
Change Details: A Correction to this paper has been published:
Change Details: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12917-021-02856-3
Ethics approval and consent to participate
: This is a retrospective study. The study design was conceived and medical records of cats were assessed long after they were discharge from the hospital, or died. Regarding access to medical records, permission was granted by the hospital Director.This work involved the use of non-experimental animals only, and followed established internationally recognised high standards (‘best practice’) of individual veterinary clinical patient care. Ethical approval from a committee was not necessary. Informed consent (either verbal or written) was obtained from the owner or legal custodian of all animals described in this ork for the procedures undertaken.
: Not Applicable.
: The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
