Possa de Menezes, Mareliza
Vedovelli Cardozo, Marita
Pereira, Natália
Bugov, Mariana
Verbisck, Newton Valerio
Castro, Vanessa
Figueiredo de Castro Nassar, Alessandra
Castro Moraes, Paola
Funding for this research was provided by:
Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo (2019/20585-0, 2021/13122-3)
Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (307791/2021-1)
Article History
Received: 29 April 2024
Accepted: 19 February 2025
First Online: 6 March 2025
Declarations
:
: This study followed the recommendations of the Brazilian National Council for the Control of Animal Experimentation (CONCEA) and National Health Council (CNS), and was approved by the Institutional Ethics Committee in the Use of Animals (protocol number 5436/20), the Research Ethics Committee (CAAE: 07111419.4.0000.9029, and 39163720.5.0000.9029), and the National System for the Management of Genetic Heritage and Associated Traditional Knowledge (SisGen) (protocol nº A621D91). Dogs’ owners and surgeons were informed of the methods and purpose of the study and provided written informed consent.
: Not applicable.
: The authors declare no competing interests.