Crossmark

Comparing the reliability and validity of the SF-36 and SF-12 in measuring quality of life among adolescents in China: a large sample cross-sectional study

Crossref DOI link: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12955-020-01605-8

Published Online: 2020-11-09

Published Print: 2020-12

Update policy: https://doi.org/10.1007/springer_crossmark_policy

Authors

Lin, Yanwei

Yu, Yulan

Zeng, Jiayong

Zhao, Xudong

Wan, Chonghua http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4546-0620
Funding

Funding for this research was provided by:

National Natural Science Foundation of China (30860248, 71804029)

Key Technologies Research and Development Program (2009BAI77B05)

Guangdong Medical Research Foundation (C2018081)

Doctoral research start-up foundation of Guangdong Medical University (B2019033)
License Information

Text and Data Mining valid from 2020-11-09

Version of Record valid from 2020-11-09
More Information

Article History

Received: 27 March 2020

Accepted: 20 October 2020

First Online: 9 November 2020

Ethics approval and consent to participate

: The study was approved by the Institutional Review Board (IRB) at the Affiliated Hospital of Guangdong Medical University. Verbal informed consent for publication was obtained from the participants and/or their relatives, as approved by the IRB.

: Not applicable.

: The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Document is current

Any future updates will be listed below