Crossmark

Comparing time and motion methods to study personnel time in the context of a family planning supply chain intervention in Senegal

Crossref DOI link: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12960-018-0328-2

Published Online: 2018-11-19

Published Print: 2018-12

Update policy: https://doi.org/10.1007/springer_crossmark_policy

Authors

McElwee, Elizabeth https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4649-0909
Cresswell, Jenny A.

Yao, Christian

Bakeu, Macaire

Cavallaro, Francesca L.

Duclos, Diane

Lynch, Caroline A.

Paintain, Lucy
Funding

Funding for this research was provided by:

Merck Sharp and Dohme
License Information

Text and Data Mining valid from 2018-11-19
More Information

Article History

Received: 12 June 2018

Accepted: 25 October 2018

First Online: 19 November 2018

Ethics approval and consent to participate

: LSHTM ethics review board (reference: 9925) and the Senegalese Ministry of Health (reference: 15/35) gave ethical approval for this study. Permission was also obtained from the regional and district managers where the study took place. Written informed consent was obtained from all participants. All data in this study was anonymized prior to analysis.

: Not Applicable.

: The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.