Crossmark

ISRIA statement: ten-point guidelines for an effective process of research impact assessment

Crossref DOI link: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12961-018-0281-5

Published Online: 2018-02-08

Published Print: 2018-12

Update policy: https://doi.org/10.1007/springer_crossmark_policy

Authors

,

Adam, Paula https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9939-071X
Ovseiko, Pavel V. https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3504-2177
Grant, Jonathan https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1646-3486
Graham, Kathryn E. A. https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3277-8987
Boukhris, Omar F.

Dowd, Anne-Maree

Balling, Gert V.

Christensen, Rikke N.

Pollitt, Alexandra

Taylor, Mark

Sued, Omar

Hinrichs-Krapels, Saba

Solans‐Domènech, Maite

Chorzempa, Heidi
More Information

Article History

Received: 29 July 2017

Accepted: 10 January 2018

First Online: 8 February 2018

Ethics approval and consent to participate

: Not applicable.

: Not applicable.

: PA, JG, KEAG, AP, OFB, A-MD, GVB, RNC, OS, SHK and MT are members of the ISRIA Steering Committee. The authors all received reimbursement of travel expenses and honoraria to attend ISRIA events. ISRIA received sponsorship support from Researchfish®, and Beverley Sherbon of Researchfish® participated in ISRIA 2016 as faculty.

: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.