Crossmark

Outcomes of an integrated knowledge translation approach in five African countries: a mixed-methods comparative case study

Crossref DOI link: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12961-024-01256-x

Published Online: 2024-12-10

Update policy: https://doi.org/10.1007/springer_crossmark_policy

Authors

Sell, Kerstin

Rehfuess, Eva

Osuret, Jimmy

Bayiga-Zziwa, Esther

Geremew, Bezinash

Pfadenhauer, Lisa
Funding

Funding for this research was provided by:

Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung (01KA1608, 01KA2023, 01KA2111A)

Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung (01KA1608, 01KA2023, 01KA2111A)

Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung (01KA1608, 01KA2023, 01KA2111A)

Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung (01KA1608, 01KA2023, 01KA2111A)

Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung (01KA1608, 01KA2023, 01KA2111A)

Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München
License Information

Text and Data Mining valid from 2024-12-10

Version of Record valid from 2024-12-10
More Information

Article History

Received: 23 April 2024

Accepted: 22 November 2024

First Online: 10 December 2024

Declarations

:

: This study was approved by the Ethics Committee of Armauer Hansen Research Institute (AHRI), Ethiopia (PO/31/20), the Ethics Review Committee of the Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, Germany (19–633), the Research and Ethics Committee at the Kamuzu University of Health Sciences, Malawi (P.11/19/2850), the Rwanda National Ethics Committee (074/RNEC/2020), the Human Research Ethics Committee of the University of Cape Town, South Africa (026/2020), and the Ethics Committee of Makerere University, Uganda (Protocol 469).

: Informed voluntary consent was sought both in writing and verbally from all participants.

: The authors declare no competing interests.

Document is current

Any future updates will be listed below