Crossmark

4D flow CMR analysis comparing patients with anatomically shaped aortic sinus prostheses, tube prostheses and healthy subjects introducing the wall shear stress gradient: a case control study

Crossref DOI link: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12968-020-00653-9

Published Print: 2020-01

Update policy: https://doi.org/10.1016/elsevier_cm_policy

Authors

Sieren, Malte Maria http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3669-2892
Schultz, Victoria

Fujita, Buntaro

Wegner, Franz

Huellebrand, Markus

Scharfschwerdt, Michael

Sievers, Hans-Hinrich

Barkhausen, Joerg

Frydrychowicz, Alex

Oechtering, Thekla Helene
License Information

Text and Data Mining valid from 2020-01-01

Text and Data Mining valid from 2020-01-01

Version of Record valid from 2020-08-10
More Information

This article is maintained by: Elsevier

Article Title: 4D flow CMR analysis comparing patients with anatomically shaped aortic sinus prostheses, tube prostheses and healthy subjects introducing the wall shear stress gradient: a case control study

Journal Title: Journal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance

CrossRef DOI link to publisher maintained version: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12968-020-00653-9

Content Type: article

Copyright: Copyright © 2020 THE AUTHORS. Published by Elsevier Inc on behalf of the Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance

Document is current

Any future updates will be listed below