Horváth, Ádám
Borbély, Éva
Bölcskei, Kata
Szentes, Nikolett
Kiss, Tamás
Belák, Mátyás
Rauch, Tibor
Glant, Tibor
Zákány, Róza
Juhász, Tamás
Karanyicz, Edina
Boldizsár, Ferenc
Helyes, Zsuzsanna
Botz, Bálint
Funding for this research was provided by:
National Brain Research Program, Hungary (20017-1.2.1-NKP-2017-00002)
GINOP, Hungary (GINOP-2.3.2-15-2016-00050)
EFOP, Hungary (EFOP-3.6.2-16-2017-00008)
New National Excellence Program of the Ministry of Human Capacities, Hungary (ÚNKP-17-4-I-PTE-96, ÚNKP-17-3-III-PTE-79)
Hungarian Academy of Sciences (Bolyai János Scholarship, Szodoray Lajos Fund, Magyary Zoltán Fund)
NIH (R01 AR059356, R21 AR064948)
Article History
Received: 19 July 2018
Accepted: 8 November 2018
First Online: 3 December 2018
Ethics approval
: The experiments were performed according to European legislation (Directive 2010/63/EU) and Hungarian Government regulation (40/2013., II. 14.) of the protection of animals used for scientific purposes. The studies were approved by the Ethics Committee on Animal Research of the University of Pécs according to the Ethical Codex of Animal Experiments (license no: BA 02/2000–2/2012) and complied with the recommendations of the International Association for the Study of Pain. The human sample collection was approved by the Institutional Review Board of Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, USA.
: Not applicable.
: The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.