Crossmark

To what extent can behaviour change techniques be identified within an adaptable implementation package for primary care? A prospective directed content analysis

Crossref DOI link: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13012-017-0704-7

Published Online: 2018-02-17

Published Print: 2018-12

Update policy: https://doi.org/10.1007/springer_crossmark_policy

Authors

,

Glidewell, Liz https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2519-2654
Willis, Thomas A.

Petty, Duncan

Lawton, Rebecca

McEachan, Rosemary R. C.

Ingleson, Emma

Heudtlass, Peter

Davies, Andrew

Jamieson, Tony

Hunter, Cheryl

Hartley, Suzanne

Gray-Burrows, Kara

Clamp, Susan

Carder, Paul

Alderson, Sarah

Farrin, Amanda J.

Foy, Robbie
More Information

Article History

Received: 30 August 2017

Accepted: 26 December 2017

First Online: 17 February 2018

Authors’ information

: Not applicable.

: The ASPIRE programme was reviewed by the Leeds Central Research Ethics Committee in June 2012 (12/YH/0254) and National Health Service research governance permissions granted by the West Yorkshire Commissioning Support Unit.

: Not applicable.

: Liz Glidewell and Robbie Foy are editors ofImplementation Science. All decisions about this manuscript were made by another editor.

: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Document is current

Any future updates will be listed below