Crossmark

Using information communication technology in models of integrated community-based primary health care: learning from the iCOACH case studies

Crossref DOI link: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13012-018-0780-3

Published Online: 2018-06-26

Published Print: 2018-12

Update policy: https://doi.org/10.1007/springer_crossmark_policy

Authors

Steele Gray, Carolyn http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2146-0001
Barnsley, Jan

Gagnon, Dominique

Belzile, Louise

Kenealy, Tim

Shaw, James

Sheridan, Nicolette

Wankah Nji, Paul

Wodchis, Walter P.
Funding

Funding for this research was provided by:

Canadian Institutes of Health Research (TTF-128263)

Health Research Council of New Zealand
License Information

Text and Data Mining valid from 2018-06-26
More Information

Article History

Received: 27 March 2018

Accepted: 11 June 2018

First Online: 26 June 2018

Ethics approval and consent to participate

: Ethics approval was granted through all relevant ethics boards across the three jurisdictions where data collection was conducted. All participants in the study provided consent to participate in this study.Overall project approval: University of Toronto Research Ethics Board (RIS-31134).Ontario cases: University of Toronto Research Ethics Board (RIS-31134), Michael Garron Hospital Research Ethics Board (630-1503-Mis-259), and Joint Bridgepoint-West Park Toronto Central CCAC-Toronto Grace Research Ethics Board.Quebec cases: Research Ethics Committee of the Charles-Le Moyne Hospital (ref. number CE-HCLM-15-001).New Zealand cases: University of Auckland Human Participants Ethics Committee (UAHPEC) (Ref. 013071).

: Not applicable

: The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.