Crossmark

Comparison of rapid vs in-depth qualitative analytic methods from a process evaluation of academic detailing in the Veterans Health Administration

Crossref DOI link: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13012-019-0853-y

Published Online: 2019-02-01

Published Print: 2019-12

Update policy: https://doi.org/10.1007/springer_crossmark_policy

Authors

Gale, Randall C.

Wu, Justina

Erhardt, Taryn

Bounthavong, Mark

Reardon, Caitlin M.

Damschroder, Laura J.

Midboe, Amanda M. http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7191-2507
License Information

Text and Data Mining valid from 2019-02-01
More Information

Article History

Received: 15 May 2018

Accepted: 7 January 2019

First Online: 1 February 2019

Ethics approval and consent to participate

: The evaluation met the definition of quality improvement and was determined by the Institutional Review Board of record, Stanford University, to be non-human subjects research.

: Not applicable.

: The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.