Retraction Retraction dated 2023-04-28
Click to view Retraction: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13018-023-03806-5
-
Authors
Alves, J. C. https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1329-3709
dos Santos, Ana Margarida Moniz Pereira
Jorge, Patrícia
Lavrador, Catarina Falcão Trigoso Vieira Bran
Carreira, L. Miguel
- License Information
-
More Information
Article History
Received: 19 March 2021
Accepted: 14 April 2021
First Online: 3 May 2021
Change Date: 28 April 2023
Change Type: Correction
Change Details: This article has been retracted. Please see the Retraction Notice for more detail:
Change Details: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13018-023-03806-5
Declarations
:
: This project was approved by the ethical review committee of the University of Évora (Órgão Responsável pelo Bem-estar dos Animais da Universidade de Évora, approval n° GD/32055/2018/P1, September 25, 2018) and complies with ARRIVE guidelines. All methods were carried out in accordance with relevant guidelines and regulations. Written, informed consent was obtained from the Institution responsible for the animals (Guarda Nacional Republicana, Portuguese Gendarmerie) through dispatch of the Doctrine and Training Commander n°327/16, dated September 16, 2016.
: Not applicable.
: FujiFilm Europe GmbH provided the CRP tests used in this study, the Stance Analyser was provided by Companion, LiteCure LLC®, and the digital thermography camera was provided by Specman, Lda®.
