Crossmark

Comparison of surgical and conservative treatment outcomes for type a aortic dissection in elderly patients

Crossref DOI link: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13019-018-0814-6

Published Online: 2018-12-18

Published Print: 2018-12

Update policy: https://doi.org/10.1007/springer_crossmark_policy

Authors

Aoyama, Takeshi

Kunisawa, Susumu

Fushimi, Kiyohide

Sawa, Teiji

Imanaka, Yuichi
Funding

Funding for this research was provided by:

Health and Labour Sciences Research Grant from the Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare, Japan (H27-iryo-ippan-001, 2015; H28-seisaku-sitei-009, 2016)

Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research from the Japan Society for the Promotion of Science ((A) 16H02634, 2014)
License Information

Text and Data Mining valid from 2018-12-01
More Information

Article History

Received: 1 October 2018

Accepted: 3 December 2018

First Online: 18 December 2018

Ethics approval and consent to participate

: This study was performed with the approval of the ethics committee of Kyoto University (approval number: R0135).

: Not applicable.

: All authors declared that they had no competing interests.

: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.