Crossmark

Parental origin of deletions and duplications – about the necessity to check for cryptic inversions

Crossref DOI link: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13039-018-0369-1

Published Online: 2018-03-09

Published Print: 2018-12

Update policy: https://doi.org/10.1007/springer_crossmark_policy

Authors

Liehr, Thomas http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1672-3054
Schreyer, Isolde

Kuechler, Alma

Manolakos, Emmanouil

Singer, Sylke

Dufke, Andreas

Wilhelm, Kathleen

Jančušková, Tereza

Čmejla, Radek

Othman, Moneeb A. K.

Al-Rikabi, Ahmed H.

Mrasek, Kristin

Ziegler, Monika

Kankel, Stefanie

Kreskowski, Katharina

Weise, Anja
Funding

Funding for this research was provided by:

VDI/VDE-IT (16KN054624)
License Information

Text and Data Mining valid from 2018-03-09
More Information

Article History

Received: 3 January 2018

Accepted: 2 March 2018

First Online: 9 March 2018

Ethics approval and consent to participate

: All procedures followed were in accordance with the ethical standards of the responsible committee on human experimentation (institutional and national). Ethics committee of University Clinic Jena approved the study (2303-05/08).

: Not applicable.

: The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.