Crossmark

Mechanical versus manual chest compressions in the treatment of in-hospital cardiac arrest patients in a non-shockable rhythm: a randomised controlled feasibility trial (COMPRESS-RCT)

Crossref DOI link: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13049-018-0538-6

Published Online: 2018-08-30

Published Print: 2018-12

Update policy: https://doi.org/10.1007/springer_crossmark_policy

Authors

,

Couper, Keith http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2123-2022
Quinn, Tom

Lall, Ranjit

Devrell, Anne

Orriss, Barry

Seers, Kate

Yeung, Joyce

Perkins, Gavin D.
Funding

Funding for this research was provided by:

Research Trainees Coordinating Centre (PDF 2015-08-109)
License Information

Text and Data Mining valid from 2018-08-30
More Information

Article History

Received: 21 June 2018

Accepted: 20 August 2018

First Online: 30 August 2018

Ethics approval and consent to participate

: The trial was approved by the West Midlands - Coventry & Warwickshire Research Ethics Committee, who waived the requirement to seek consent from patient participants prior to enrolment.

: Not applicable

: TQ, RL, and GDP were investigators on the PARAMEDIC trial, which was an NIHR funded trial that evaluated the use of mechanical chest compression devices in the pre-hospital setting. The remaining authors declare that they have no competing interests.

: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Document is current

Any future updates will be listed below