Crossmark

Delirium prediction in the intensive care unit: comparison of two delirium prediction models

Crossref DOI link: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13054-018-2037-6

Published Online: 2018-05-05

Published Print: 2018-12

Update policy: https://doi.org/10.1007/springer_crossmark_policy

Authors

Wassenaar, Annelies

Schoonhoven, Lisette

Devlin, John W.

van Haren, Frank M. P.

Slooter, Arjen J. C.

Jorens, Philippe G.

van der Jagt, Mathieu

Simons, Koen S.

Egerod, Ingrid

Burry, Lisa D.

Beishuizen, Albertus

Matos, Joaquim

Donders, A. Rogier T.

Pickkers, Peter

van den Boogaard, Mark http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4233-2903
License Information

Text and Data Mining valid from 2018-05-05
More Information

Article History

Received: 27 November 2017

Accepted: 13 April 2018

First Online: 5 May 2018

Ethics approval and consent to participate

: The study was reviewed by the Medical Research Ethics Committee (MREC) Arnhem-Nijmegen region, The Netherlands (CMO Region Arnhem-Nijmegen, no. 2015–1782) and the local MRECs/ Institutional Review Boards (IRBs)/ Research Ethics Boards (REBs) of the participating ICUs. Each institutional MREC/IRB/REB waived the need for informed consent. Only de-identified data were entered into the study database and used for analysis.

: The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.