Document is current
Any future updates will be listed below
-
Authors
Rob, Daniel
Smalcova, Jana
Smid, Ondrej
Kral, Ales
Kovarnik, Tomas
Zemanek, David
Kavalkova, Petra
Huptych, Michal
Komarek, Arnost
Franek, Ondrej
Havranek, Stepan
Linhart, Ales
Belohlavek, Jan https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9455-9224
-
Clinical Trials BETA
Clinical trials referenced in this document:
nct01511666 at ClinicalTrials.govDocuments that mention this clinical trial
Effect of intra-arrest transport, extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation and immediate invasive assessment in refractory out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: a long-term follow-up of the Prague OHCA trial
https://doi.org/10.1186/s13054-024-04901-7
Extracorporeal versus conventional cardiopulmonary resuscitation for refractory out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: a secondary analysis of the Prague OHCA trial
https://doi.org/10.1186/s13054-022-04199-3
Extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation probably good, but adoption should not be too fast and furious!
https://doi.org/10.1136/emermed-2016-206442
Authors’ response: Extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation probably good, but adoption should not be too fast and furious!
https://doi.org/10.1136/emermed-2017-206801
-
Funding
Funding for this research was provided by:
This study was supported by MH CZ-DRO-VFN64165, VFN: General University Hospital in Prague and the Charles University Research program “Cooperatio – Intensive Care Medicine”.
- License Information
-
More Information
Article History
Received: 13 September 2022
Accepted: 7 October 2022
First Online: 27 October 2022
Declarations
:
: The corresponding author (JB) has received lecture honoraria from Maquet Company, Czech Republic. Remaining authors report no conflict of interests.
: The original study as well as secondary analyses was approved by the Institutional Review Board of the General University Hospital and First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University in Prague (192/11 S-IV).
: All patients who regained normal neurological function were asked to provide their written consent regarding the use of their data. Consent requirements were waived for patients who died at the scene and never reached the hospital and for participants without known legal representatives.
