Crossmark

Comparison of whole-genome bisulfite sequencing library preparation strategies identifies sources of biases affecting DNA methylation data

Crossref DOI link: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13059-018-1408-2

Published Online: 2018-03-15

Published Print: 2018-12

Update policy: https://doi.org/10.1007/springer_crossmark_policy

Authors

Olova, Nelly https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8093-4932
Krueger, Felix

Andrews, Simon

Oxley, David

Berrens, Rebecca V.

Branco, Miguel R.

Reik, Wolf
Funding

Funding for this research was provided by:

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council (BB/K010867/1)

Wellcome Trust (095645/Z/11/Z)

EU EpiGeneSys (257082)

EU BLUEPRINT (282510)

Sir Henry Dale Fellowship (101225/Z/13/Z))

BBSRC CASE Studentship

Babraham Institute/Cambridge European Trust Studentship
License Information

Text and Data Mining valid from 2018-03-15
More Information

Article History

Received: 10 July 2017

Accepted: 14 February 2018

First Online: 15 March 2018

Change Date: 22 February 2019

Change Type: Correction

Change Details: Following publication of the original article [1], it was reported that the incorrect “Additional file 3” was published. The correct additional file is given below.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

: Not applicable.

: Not applicable.

: The authors declare no competing financial interests. WR is a consultant and shareholder at Cambridge Epigenetix Ltd.

: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.