Document is current

Any future updates will be listed below

Is using multiple imputation better than complete case analysis for estimating a prevalence (risk) difference in randomized controlled trials when binary outcome observations are missing?

Crossref DOI link: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13063-016-1473-3

Published Online: 2016-07-22

Published Print: 2016-12

Update policy: https://doi.org/10.1007/springer_crossmark_policy

About CrossMark