Crossmark

Male synthetic sling versus artificial urinary sphincter trial for men with urodynamic stress incontinence after prostate surgery (MASTER): study protocol for a randomised controlled trial

Crossref DOI link: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13063-018-2501-2

Published Online: 2018-02-21

Published Print: 2018-12

Update policy: https://doi.org/10.1007/springer_crossmark_policy

Authors

,

Constable, Lynda https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9646-3904
Cotterill, Nikki

Cooper, David

Glazener, Cathryn

Drake, Marcus J.

Forrest, Mark

Harding, Chris

Kilonzo, Mary

MacLennan, Graeme

McCormack, Kirsty

McDonald, Alison

Mundy, Anthony

Norrie, John

Pickard, Robert

Ramsay, Craig

Smith, Rebecca

Wileman, Samantha

Abrams, Paul
Funding

Funding for this research was provided by:

Health Technology Assessment Programme (11/106/01)
More Information

Article History

Received: 3 October 2017

Accepted: 18 January 2018

First Online: 21 February 2018

Ethics approval and consent to participate

: The NRES South West – Frenchay Research Ethics Committee has reviewed this study. The study will be conducted according to the principles of good practice provided by Research Governance Guidelines. We believe this study does not pose any specific risks to individual participants beyond those of any surgery, nor does it raise any extraordinary ethical issues.

: Not applicable.

: The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Document is current

Any future updates will be listed below