Crossmark

Enhancing practitioners’ confidence in recruitment and consent in the EcLiPSE trial: a mixed-method evaluation of site training – a Paediatric Emergency Research in the United Kingdom and Ireland (PERUKI) study

Crossref DOI link: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13063-019-3273-z

Published Online: 2019-03-21

Published Print: 2019-12

Update policy: https://doi.org/10.1007/springer_crossmark_policy

Authors

Woolfall, Kerry https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5726-5304
Roper, Louise

Humphreys, Amy

Lyttle, Mark D.

Messahel, Shrouk

Lee, Elizabeth

Noblet, Joanne

Iyer, Anand

Gamble, Carrol

Hickey, Helen

Rainford, Naomi

Appleton, Richard
Funding

Funding for this research was provided by:

Health Technology Assessment Programme (12/127/134)
License Information

Text and Data Mining valid from 2019-03-21
More Information

Article History

Received: 9 May 2018

Accepted: 1 March 2019

First Online: 21 March 2019

Ethics approval and consent to participate

: Ethical approval was not required to conduct the site training evaluation questionnaire or online questionnaire. Interviews and focus groups with practitioners were approved as part of the EcLiPSE trial by National Research Ethics Service Committee North West- Liverpool Central (15/NW/0090).

: Not applicable as individual details are not contained in the manuscript.

: The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Document is current

Any future updates will be listed below