Crossmark

Women’s experiences of participating in a randomised trial comparing alternative policies for timing of cord clamping at very preterm birth: a questionnaire study

Crossref DOI link: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13063-019-3325-4

Published Online: 2019-04-16

Published Print: 2019-12

Update policy: https://doi.org/10.1007/springer_crossmark_policy

Authors

Bradshaw, Lucy https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8382-6040
Sawyer, Alexandra

Mitchell, Eleanor

Armstrong-Buisseret, Lindsay

Ayers, Susan

Duley, Lelia
Funding

Funding for this research was provided by:

Programme Grants for Applied Research (RPPG-0609-10107)
License Information

Text and Data Mining valid from 2019-04-16
More Information

Article History

Received: 21 September 2018

Accepted: 25 March 2019

First Online: 16 April 2019

Ethics approval and consent to participate

: Approval for this study was granted by the Nottingham 2 Research Ethics Committee (NRES reference 12/EM/0283). All participants gave written informed consent or oral assent prior to randomisation. Written consent was gained for participants giving oral assent prior to sending/giving out follow-up questionnaires.

: Not applicable.

: The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Document is current

Any future updates will be listed below