Document is current
Any future updates will be listed below
-
Authors
Overbeck, Gritt https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1740-1148
Kragstrup, Jakob
Gørtz, Mette https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9346-0625
Rasmussen, Ida Scheel
Graungaard, Anette Hauskov https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7242-7324
Siersma, Volkert https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1941-2681
de Voss, Sarah https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9018-9534
Ertmann, Ruth Kirk https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4629-3518
Shahrzad, Sinead
Appel, Clara Lundmark
Wilson, Philip https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4123-8248
-
Funding
Funding for this research was provided by:
TrygFonden (125227)
- License Information
-
More Information
Article History
Received: 7 November 2022
Accepted: 20 December 2022
First Online: 4 January 2023
Declarations
:
: All procedures are in accordance with the Helsinki II Declaration and Danish Law. The trial has been approved by the University of Copenhagen Research Ethics committee for Science and Health (ref. 504–0111/195000) The Ethical Committee of The Capital Region of Denmark decided (reg. no. H-19015507) that a general resilience intervention for all pregnant women was not a medical intervention and according to Danish legislation, the study does not need approval in the regional ethical committee system. All women in the study signed an informed consent at inclusion. GPs in the study collected written consent and consent forms were uploaded in REDCap []. Once consent forms were registered in REDCap, the woman was included and received the first questionnaire.
: Not applicable.
: The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
