Jaramillo, Sonia http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2397-3070
Le Cornet, Lucian
Kratzmann, Markus
Krisam, Johannes
Görner, Martin
Hänel, Mathias
Röllig, Christoph
Wass, Maxi
Scholl, Sebastian
Ringhoffer, Mark
Reichart, Alexander
Steffen, Björn
Kayser, Sabine
Mikesch, Jan-Henrik
Schaefer-Eckart, Kerstin
Schubert, Jörg
Geer, Thomas
Martin, Sonja
Kieser, Meinhard
Sauer, Tim
Kriegsmann, Katharina
Hundemer, Michael
Serve, Hubert
Bornhäuser, Martin
Müller-Tidow, Carsten
Schlenk, Richard F.
Funding for this research was provided by:
Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG- SCHL 2118/2-1)
Daiichi-Sankyo
Universitätsklinikum Heidelberg
Article History
Received: 26 November 2021
Accepted: 27 May 2023
First Online: 15 September 2023
Declarations
:
: Before the start of the trial, the trial protocol, informed consent document, and any other appropriate documents are submitted to the independent Ethics Committee (EC) as well as to the competent federal authority (BfArM). A written favorable vote of the EC and an (implicit) approval by the competent higher federal authority are a prerequisite for initiation of the clinical trial. The statement of EC should contain the title of the trial, the trial code, the trial site, and a list of reviewed documents. It must mention the date on which the decision was made and must be officially signed by a committee member. Before the first patient is enrolled in the trial, all ethical and legal requirements must be met. All planned substantial changes (see §10, (1) of German GCP-Regulation) are to be submitted to EC and the competent federal authority in writing as amendments. They have to be approved by the EC and the competent federal authority. The Coordinating Investigator or the NCT Trial Center, and if applicable the investigator(s) are keeping a record of all communication with the EC and the regulatory authorities. Pursuant to the German Drug Law (AMG) and the GCP Regulation, the EC and the competent higher federal authority are informed of all suspected unexpected serious unexpected adverse reactions (SUSARs) and all AEs resulting in death or being life-threatening, which occur during the trial. Both institutions are informed in case the benefit-risk assessment did change or any other new and significant hazards for patients’ safety or welfare did occur. Furthermore, a report on all observed serious adverse events (SAEs) is submitted once a year (Development Safety Update Report (DSUR)). The EC and the regulatory authorities must be informed of the end of the trial. They have to be provided with a summary of trial results within one year after the end of the clinical phase (LPLV).
: The first author signs for and accepts responsibility for releasing this material on behalf of any and all co-authors.
: The authors declare that they have no competing interests.