Document is current
Any future updates will be listed below
-
Authors
González, Mikel A.
Dilger, Erin
Ronderos, María M.
Spinelli, Gustavo R.
Courtenay, Orin
Hamilton, James G. C. https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9196-8516
-
Funding
Funding for this research was provided by:
Wellcome Trust (080961/Z/06/Z)
- License Information
-
More Information
Article History
Received: 9 May 2020
Accepted: 24 October 2020
First Online: 7 November 2020
Ethics approval and consent to participate
: Application of insecticide impregnated dog collars was reviewed and approved by the Committee for Ethical Use of Animals [CEUA (FOA-00124-2013)], UNESP, Brazil, and the Animal Welfare and Ethical Approval Body [AWERB, (48723), University of Warwick, UK]. Informed written consent was obtained from dog owners to sample and fit collars to their dogs. Consent was obtained from the district health authorities to conduct the study within their administrative jurisdictions. The project, including the involvement of householders, was reviewed and approved by the Faculty of Health and Medicine Ethical Review Committee (FHMREC15125) at Lancaster University, Lancaster, UK. This study was carried out in accordance with the guidelines of the Animals in Science Regulation Unit (ASRU) and in compliance with the Animals (Scientific Procedures) Act (ASPA) 1986 (amended 2012) regulations and was consistent with UK Animal Welfare Act 2006 and The Welfare of Farmed Animals (England) Regulations 2007 and 2010.
: Not applicable.
: The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
