Document is current
Any future updates will be listed below
-
Authors
de Aquino, Lidia Mendes http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5141-6028
Zapa, Dina Maria Beltran http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4466-1516
de Castro Rodrigues, Daniel http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9792-5744
Strydom, Tom http://orcid.org/0009-0004-1490-5801
Torres, Siddhartha http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3315-894X
Ferreira, Lorena Lopes http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0813-3054
Barufi, Francisco http://orcid.org/0009-0004-5685-5603
de Amaral, Heitor Oliveira Arriero http://orcid.org/0009-0003-5260-7322
de Borges, Fernando de Almeida http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8888-6269
Gallina, Tiago http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5536-896X
de Mendonça, Rafael Paranhos http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7694-2817
Soares, Vando Edésio http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6258-0264
Monteiro, Caio Marcio Oliveira http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5253-5451
Lopes, Welber Daniel Zanetti http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8009-8436
- License Information
-
More Information
Article History
Received: 28 September 2023
Accepted: 19 December 2023
First Online: 8 January 2024
Declarations
:
: The study was approved by the Ethics Committee on the Use of Animals (ECUA) of the Federal University of Goiás (UFG) (Protocol 072/18).
: The present work was funded by “MSD Animal Health,” the manufacturer of this formulation. There were no conflicting interests that may have biased the work reported in this paper.
: The authors obtained consent from the responsible authorities at the institute/organization where the work has been carried out before the work is submitted.
