dos Santos, Katharine Costa
Guedes, Paula Elisa Brandão
Albuquerque, George Rêgo
de Jesus, Anderson Vieira
da Paixão Sevá, Anaiá
de Oliveira, Joana Thaisa Santos
de Carvalho Teixeira, Jamille Bispo
Bitar, Thammy Vieira
Harvey, Tatiani Vitor
Ramos, Sofia Nadir Sanches
Barufi, Francisco Bonomi
de Almeida Borges, Fernando
Carlos, Renata Santiago Alberto
Funding for this research was provided by:
Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior (001, 001, 001)
Universidade Estadual de Santa Cruz
Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado da Bahia
Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico
Merck Sharp & Dohme LLC
Article History
Received: 27 February 2024
Accepted: 7 April 2024
First Online: 29 April 2024
Declarations
:
: This study was approved by the Animal Use Ethics Committee (CEUA) of State University of Santa Cruz (UESC), Ilhéus, Bahia, Brazil (020/2019). This study was conducted considering the principles of “Good Clinical Practice” VICH GL9 (GCP) adopted by the Committee for Medicinal Products for Veterinary Use (CVMP), European Medicines Agency (EMA) in June 2000 (CVMP/VICH/595/98-Final). Informed consent was obtained from the owners of all animals included in the study.
: Not applicable.
: The following authors have a conflict of interest: Sofia Nadir Sanches Ramos and Francisco Bonomi Barufi are employees at MSD Animal Health. The other authors declare no conflicts of interest.