Document is current
Any future updates will be listed below
-
Authors
Holliday, Judith
Jones, Natalie
Cooke, Jo
-
Funding
Funding for this research was provided by:
National Institute for Health Research Collaboration for Leadership in Applied Health Research and Care Yorkshire and Humber
NIHR Clinical Research Network Yorkshire and Humber
- License Information
-
More Information
Article History
Received: 10 February 2023
Accepted: 21 September 2023
First Online: 5 October 2023
Declarations
:
: The authors declare no competing interests.
: Ethical approval was not required as this is a service improvement project, registered at Sheffield Teaching Hospitals Trust.This project was registered with Sheffield Teaching Hospitals FT Trust as a service evaluation project with the clinical effectiveness unit (CEU) project number 8952 on electronic database AIMS and all methods were carried out in accordance with relevant guidelines and regulations. The project is titled <i>‘VICTOR- Making Visible the Impact of Research in the NHS: developing a research impact tool for clinicians.’</i> Natalie Jones was listed as the project lead. The sample period was 17/09/2017–07/01/2019 and the data collection period was 08/01/2018–31/12/2018. All participants in the evaluation gave informed consent to participate. They were provided with information about the project in writing and /or verbally. They had an opportunity to think about participation and whether they would like to take part before consent was taken. Findings from participants were anonymised to protect confidentiality. All relevant procedures for service evaluations in Sheffield Teaching Hospitals were adhered to and the project was supported by a co-ordinator from the clinical effectiveness unit to ensure relevant procedures were followed.As a service evaluation, the project does not require ethical approval through HRA however this project was conducted with the rigour and safeguards of research to protect participants’ data. The service evaluation was registered with the author’s organisation (STH) clinical effectiveness unit. Efforts were made to ensure that this project adhered to best practice guidance for service evaluation practice [CitationRef removed]. Consent to participate in the stakeholder consultations was through explicit verbal or written consent. Those agreeing to view the prototype tool and provide feedback were aware that their feedback data would be used in project reports and dissemination, and all data would be anonymised.
: Not applicable.
