Updates are available Correction dated 2024-11-06
Click to view Correction: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13287-024-04044-0
-
Authors
Koda, Masao https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0982-5386
Imagama, Shiro
Nakashima, Hiroaki
Ito, Sadayuki
Segi, Naoki
Ouchida, Jun
Suda, Kota
Harmon Matsumoto, Satoko
Komatsu, Miki
Endo, Toshiki
Suzuki, Shinsuke
Inami, Satoshi
Ueda, Haruki
Miyagi, Masayuki
Inoue, Gen
Takaso, Masashi
Nagata, Keiji
Yamada, Hiroshi
Kamei, Naosuke
Nakamae, Toshio
Suzuki, Hidenori
Nishida, Norihiro
Funaba, Masahiro
Kumagai, Gentaro
Furuya, Takeo
Yamato, Yu
Funayama, Toru
Takahashi, Hiroshi
Yamazaki, Masashi
- License Information
-
More Information
Article History
Received: 18 October 2023
Accepted: 11 July 2024
First Online: 13 August 2024
Change Date: 6 November 2024
Change Type: Correction
Change Details: A Correction to this paper has been published:
Change Details: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13287-024-04044-0
Declarations
:
: The study was conducted according to the guidelines of the Declaration of Helsinki and approved by the institutional ethics review board of Chiba University Hospital (one of the participating institutes, ) (protocol code 705; 11 June 2019, title of the approved project: A clinical study of CL2020 in patients with spinal cord injury). The principal investigator prepared the informed consent form such that informed consent was obtained from the patient and the patient’s legal representative. In cases where the trial participant could not physically sign the informed consent form because of upper extremity palsy caused by SCI, allographs provided by the patients’ representatives were allowed.
: Written Informed consents were obtained from all subjects and the patient’s legal representative involved in the study to participate in this study and for publication of this study. In cases where the trial participant could not physically sign the informed consent form because of upper extremity palsy caused by SCI, allographs provided by the patients’ representatives were allowed.
: The authors declare that they have no competing interests. The funder had no role in the design of the study; in the collection, analyses, or interpretation of data; in the writing of the manuscript; or in the decision to publish the results.
