Vázquez, Patricia
Osoro, Koldo
Fernández, Miguel
Román-Trufero, Alicia
Regidor-Cerrillo, Javier
Jiménez-Pelayo, Laura
García-Sánchez, Marta
Rojo-Montejo, Silvia
Benavides, Julio
Horcajo, Pilar
Ortega-Mora, Luis Miguel
Funding for this research was provided by:
Ministerio de Economía y Competitividad (FJCI-2014-20982, BES-2014-070723)
Universidad Complutense de Madrid (ES) - Banco Santander
Article History
Received: 11 June 2019
Accepted: 19 August 2019
First Online: 23 September 2019
Change Date: 14 October 2019
Change Type: Correction
Change Details: In the original publication of this article [1], there are error in the Fig. 5, the “ml” should be replaced by “mL” (Fig. 5A) and “IFNγ” should be “IFN-γ” in Fig. 5A, B. The correct figure is below:
Ethics approval and consent to participate
: All protocols involving animals (challenge procedures of experimental <i>N. caninum</i> infection, monitoring of pregnancies, blood samplings of dams and newborn calves, and euthanasia method used for anaesthetized animals) were approved by the Animal Research Ethics Committee of the Principado de Asturias, Spain (reference number PROAE 25/2016). To enhance animal well-being and minimize suffering, good clinical practices were also performed. Likewise, current Spanish (Law 32/2007, R.D. 53/2013) and European (Council Directive 2010/63/EU) legal requirements and guidelines regarding experimentation and animal welfare were considered to carry out these experiments.
: The authors declare that they have no competing interests.