Crossmark

Comparison of the accuracy of neutrophil CD64, procalcitonin, and C-reactive protein for sepsis identification: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Crossref DOI link: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13613-018-0479-2

Published Print: 2019

Update policy: https://doi.org/10.1016/elsevier_cm_policy

Authors

Yeh, Chun-Fu https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1222-7611
Wu, Chin-Chieh

Liu, Su-Hsun

Chen, Kuan-Fu
Funding

Funding for this research was provided by:

Ministry of Science and Technology, Taiwan (106-2314-B-182-028)

Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Linkou (CMRPG2C0201)

Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Linkou (CMRPG2B0123)

Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Linkou (CMRPG2B0273)

Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Linkou (CIRPG2E0022)

Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Linkou (CMRPG2B0373)
License Information

Text and Data Mining valid from 2019-01-01

Text and Data Mining valid from 2019-01-01

Version of Record valid from 2025-11-19
More Information

This article is maintained by: Elsevier

Article Title: Comparison of the accuracy of neutrophil CD64, procalcitonin, and C-reactive protein for sepsis identification: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Journal Title: Annals of Intensive Care

CrossRef DOI link to publisher maintained version: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13613-018-0479-2

Content Type: article

Copyright: Copyright © 2019 The Author(s) 2019. Published by Elsevier Masson SAS