Crossmark

Response to: 500 mg as bolus followed by an extended infusion of 1500 mg of meropenem every 8 h failed to achieve in one-third of the patients an optimal PK/PD against nonresistant strains of these organisms: is CRRT responsible for this situation?

Crossref DOI link: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13613-020-00781-6

Published Print: 2020

Update policy: https://doi.org/10.1016/elsevier_cm_policy

Authors

Kothekar, Amol

Divatia, Jigeeshu Vasishtha https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7384-4886
Myatra, Sheila Nainan

Gota, Vikram
License Information

Text and Data Mining valid from 2020-01-01

Text and Data Mining valid from 2020-01-01

Version of Record valid from 2025-11-19
More Information

This article is maintained by: Elsevier

Article Title: Response to: 500 mg as bolus followed by an extended infusion of 1500 mg of meropenem every 8 h failed to achieve in one-third of the patients an optimal PK/PD against nonresistant strains of these organisms: is CRRT responsible for this situation?

Journal Title: Annals of Intensive Care

CrossRef DOI link to publisher maintained version: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13613-020-00781-6

Content Type: article

Copyright: Copyright © 2020 The Author(s) 2020. Published by Elsevier Masson SAS

Document is current

Any future updates will be listed below