Crossmark

Toward a comprehensive evidence map of overview of systematic review methods: paper 2—risk of bias assessment; synthesis, presentation and summary of the findings; and assessment of the certainty of the evidence

Crossref DOI link: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13643-018-0784-8

Published Online: 2018-10-12

Published Print: 2018-12

Update policy: https://doi.org/10.1007/springer_crossmark_policy

Authors

Lunny, Carole

Brennan, Sue E.

McDonald, Steve

McKenzie, Joanne E. https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3534-1641
Funding

Funding for this research was provided by:

Australian Postgraduate Award, International Postgraduate Research Scholarship

National Health and Medical Research Council (1143429)
License Information

Text and Data Mining valid from 2018-10-12
More Information

Article History

Received: 25 April 2018

Accepted: 19 July 2018

First Online: 12 October 2018

Ethics approval and consent to participate

: Not applicable

: Not applicable

: JEM is an Associate Editor of Systematic Reviews and is a Guest Editor for the thematic series ‘Overviews of systematic reviews: development and evaluation of methods’, to which this paper was submitted. SEB is an Associate Editor of Systematic Reviews. Neither JEM nor SEB were involved in the peer-review or editorial decisions for this manuscript. CL and SM declare that they have no competing interests.

: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Document is current

Any future updates will be listed below