Lix, Lisa M.
Dahl, Matthew
St-Jean, Audray
Golandouz, Hassan Maleki
Ling, Vicki
Janzen, Donica
Ronksley, Paul E.
Scory, Tayler Dawn
Dutton, Daniel J.
Manning, Devin
Carney, Greg
Perras, Christine
Ernst, Pierre
,
Platt, Robert W.
Suissa, Samy
Dormuth, Colin R.
Ronksley, Paul E.
Katz, Alan
Paterson, J. Michael
Filion, Kristian B.
Sketris, Ingrid S.
Funding for this research was provided by:
CDA-AMC, Canada (Grant #C222 360)
Article History
Received: 7 November 2025
Accepted: 10 March 2026
First Online: 25 March 2026
Declarations
:
: Research ethics board approvals were obtained at each participating institution: the Conjoint Health Research Ethics Board at the University of Calgary (Alberta); the Clinical Research Ethics Board at the University of British Columbia (British Columbia); the Health Research Ethics Board at the University of Manitoba (Manitoba); the Health Sciences Research Ethics Board at Dalhousie University (Nova Scotia); and the Biomedical Research Ethics Board at the University of Saskatchewan (Saskatchewan), except at ICES in Ontario, where research ethics board approval was not legally required. Informed consent was not required because this study used anonymized administrative data. All methods were carried out in accordance with relevant guidelines and regulations.
: Not applicable.
: The authors declare no competing interests.