Document is current
Any future updates will be listed below
-
Authors
Tiruvoipati, Ravindranath
Reddy, Mallikarjuna Ponnapa
Paul, Eldho
Gupta, Sachin
Subramaniam, Ashwin
Zhang, David
Haji, Kavi
-
Clinical Trials BETA
Clinical trials referenced in this document:
nct06398951 at ClinicalTrials.govDocuments that mention this clinical trial
A comparison of conventional high-flow nasal cannula vs the duet high-flow nasal cannula in extubated patients: a randomized crossover trial
https://doi.org/10.1186/s40001-025-02447-0
-
Funding
Funding for this research was provided by:
Fisher and Paykel HealthCare Limited
- License Information
-
More Information
Article History
Received: 12 August 2024
Accepted: 10 March 2025
First Online: 26 March 2025
Declarations
:
: Ethics approval was obtained from the Human Research and Ethics Committee of Peninsula Health (Reference Number: HREC/88599/PH-2022/ SSA: SSA/88599/PH-2022, Approval Date 26th November 2022; Title: A comparison of conventional high-flow nasal cannula vs two-nare size high-flow nasal cannula: a randomized crossover trial in extubated patients). The study was conducted in accordance with the ethical standards of the responsible committee on human experimentation and with the Helsinki Declaration of 1975 and local regulatory requirements. Consent was obtained either from the patient, or their medical treatment decision-maker or the legal next of kin. The authors assume responsibility for the fidelity of the trial to the protocol and for the accuracy and completeness of the data and analyses.
: Not applicable.
: The authors declare no competing interests.
