Mahmutovic, Lejla
Akcesme, Betul
Durakovic, Camil
Akcesme, Faruk Berat
Maric, Aida
Adilovic, Muhamed
Hamad, Nour
Wjst, Matthias
Feeney, Oliver
Semiz, Sabina https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2629-4660
Funding for this research was provided by:
Council of Ministers of Bosnia and Herzegovina / Ministry of Civil Affairs of Bosnia and Herzegovina (VM #141/16)
Article History
Received: 29 June 2018
Accepted: 28 October 2018
First Online: 14 November 2018
Authors’ information
: Sabina Semiz, PhD, is a Professor in Genetics and Bioengineering at the International University of Sarajevo (IUS). She is the Head of the Bosnia and Herzegovina Unit of the UNESCO Chair in Bioethics, Chair of the Cambridge Bioethics Education Network Working Group, and a member of the Management Committee of the CHIP ME COST Action IS1303 “Citizen’s Health through public-private Initiatives: Public health, Market and Ethical perspectives.” Matthias Wjst, PhD, and Oliver Feeney, PhD, (Researcher in Political Theory and Bioethics at the Centre of Bioethical Research and Analysis) are members of the Management Committee and Working Group 2 and Working Group 3 of the CHIP ME COST Action IS1303. Faruk Berat Akcesme, PhD, and Betul Akcesme, PhD, were Assistant Professors at the Genetics and Bioengineering Program at FENS, and they recently joined the Faculty of Medicine, University of Health Sciences, Istanbul, Turkey. Lejla Mahmutovic and Muhamed Adilovic are PhD students, while Camil Durakovic, Aida Maric, and Nour Hamad were master students at the IUS. Aida Maric recently started her PhD program at the Plant Biotechnology Department, Faculty of Pharmacy and Food Sciences, at the University of Barcelona, Spain.
: The study was approved by the Ethical Committee of the International University of Sarajevo (protocol number: IUS-REC-01-575/2017). Each participant was informed of the objectives of the study and informed consent was obtained from all participants.
: Not applicable.
: The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.